That was the question I here some time ago got into the mail from one of my group members for social media on LinkedIn. The question was rooted in a frustration related to that in a digital world without impaired regulations tweet it on boring presenters and hopeless argumeneter by a norm of what is there and then "lend itself". The keenest twittering, not only as a summary conclusion, but will also be happy with commentary along the way. The questioner asserts that the comments therefore may be ill-considered and "unjust" in the sense that the speaker may come with a buildup of arguments that listeners have not yet heard. The questions it asked is whether the statements should be compared with private comments gnomeo and juliet to friends and colleagues, or whether they should be considered public utterances? I think the questions are interesting and relevant. The same applies to all comments gnomeo and juliet received afterwards, which should be read! Although I own experiences, so far fortunately gnomeo and juliet most positive. And of course it is satisfying, read pleasant twitter messages about what you convey from the pulpit while you hold lectures. But one day it can repay. The day that you say or do not fall into good soil, or that there are other reasons why someone is critical to your message, the opposite will happen, that you get your passport stated on them - in public. As in the worst sense was for antroplogen Danah Boyd that day she experienced all presenters nightmare. Is however agreed that whoever holds talks at seminars and meetings, should regard it is said that publicly, and thus regarded tweets and blogging from participants as expected in today's media world. Internet may seem like a lawless universe. Perhaps precisely because we share information here which we had not shared if we had met face to face. Anyway, in social media must be aware that the way we communicate may have consequences for others. These are new phenomena that are forcing gnomeo and juliet us to think about how social media is used and how quickly news can spread. Here plays the importance of the tone of the communication gnomeo and juliet and the way we oration on an important role. It is easy to quickly publish a thought one lynkjapt got in his head. However complicated it becomes when the idea was not so smart and thoughtful as it might first seem. This chapter focuses on what is called manners 2.0 and netiquette. Interpersonal interaction in social media is no different from the dialogue that takes place over a restaurant table in a pub, in the classroom or anywhere else where you act with other people. In this respect one should have as a general rule that everything you publish online is something you could also have spoken about for a crowd with a mix of good friends, family, journalists and foreigners. SINTEF researcher Petter Bae Brandtzæg believe that messages on social networking sites can be easily misunderstood and therefore gnomeo and juliet urges people to be cautious. People throw away his halvfleipete messages gnomeo and juliet on Facebook and when it's there, it might seem more serious than it was intended by the sender, he claims.
Illustration: Courtesy 2.0; Be factual and compliance with regulations, when people take you seriously. Kåre Garnes has blog Kuttisme.no written an interesting and thought-provoking article that is based on Dale Carnegie's 75 year old advice gnomeo and juliet on how businesspeople to succeed better in their relationships with customers and partners. I agree. The old boards can be transmitted to how businesses should behave in social media. I also agree with Ole Emil Johnsen in Colt who in comments saying that the article focuses on the link between interpersonal interaction and social media. He argues that such mechanisms do not stop working online, and of course strong contributing factors to the web development. I fully agree. Carnegie's advice on how to get people to like you can read here.
My experience of networking and social media shows that most have good manners / netiquette in most forums. But regrettably, there will always be some who do not have borders and perhaps considering insufficient what they write / commenting. And especially by the characteristics of individual posts. My experience comes from adult forums, I think with horror how it is when the youth network / the younger generation. From a Semiotic gnomeo and juliet perspective: Not having netiquette is the same as Unettetikette - which figuratively means knife and fork communication (or sit with the knife ready in his pocket communication)! Such ufin behavior says little about the recipient, but says everything about the sender! Nobody wants well to write with a pen made of a knife and fork to get your message across!
