2013 (29) September (2) August (5) film To Kill a Mockingbird Arnold Stadler: Death and I, we

The original title of the film, as well as the book on which the film is To Kill a Mockingbird. In the Slovenian translation of the book has been a small inconsistency. The Slovenian 2 kids 1 sandbox we have this amazing book Harper Lee published under the title Do not kill nightingale. 2 kids 1 sandbox Mockingbird by no means the English word for nightingale, but a Mockingbird or American piece. Why did the translator opted for a nightingale instead of oponašalko, I do not know. We have a bird that is our people closer to the geographical 2 kids 1 sandbox environment, a hotel closer to the book itself and encourage greater interest 2 kids 1 sandbox in it? Possible. Anyway, he do not blame too. Nightingale and oponašalka are probably similar behavior and thus the symbolism of the novel equally 2 kids 1 sandbox suitable.
Since my book was Harper Lee not kill nightingale very much and because I was kindly reminded that there is a movie made after this book, I have sought and film him recently with his family as a mirror. Even though the film is in black and white and without the effects of modern digital techniques, filmed back in 1962, they were like. While organizing this visit I felt that I was a little bit like Barack Obama, who recently prepared a similar view of the same film in the family theater of the White House and invited to watch the students surrounding schools :) The main focus of the film is on trial, where Dark-skinned young man accused of the rape of white girls. Gregory Peck as Atticus, a lawyer who defends an accused person is unique and it is not unusual that this role also won an Oscar. The role played by heart, like the heart Atticus defending a black man accused of his. Peckova game is exceptional - both facial expressions as a part time (eg,., Whether it's a girl beat left-handed or right-handed). With calm and dignified attitude of the audience to leave the court and to convince viewers the film with the defendant's innocence. That he succeeds without elevation of voice, theatrical without downtime or even bizarre 2 kids 1 sandbox and unusual behavior, so often found in modern TV shows from the courts (in my mind comes Alan Shore from Boston Legal, which is usually just like to watch). Gregory Peck was also in his personal life outstanding philanthropist, who has been actively advocating for human rights. The role of dedicated lawyers, it was so perfect for him. The only thing that I was relating to him as a book bralko wrong, it was that it was for Atticus far too neat. But I have this quickly and easily get used ;) Since most of the film focuses on the events in court, remains little room for Atticusovo 2 kids 1 sandbox daughter Scout and her companionship. This I am sorry, because I was reading the book Atticusov attitude towards family almost more important and interesting than his role on the court. The other residents of the city are more succinctly presented. Many events have been released, but this is understandable - the film lasts for more than two hours. The main thing is that the film nevertheless established the characteristic atmosphere of the U.S. southern city in the thirties of the last century, which provides the appropriate 2 kids 1 sandbox background to the rest of the action. Mary Badham in the role of Scout's 2 kids 1 sandbox fine, as well as her boy companion in the game. Cute display of carefree childhood is to be secured. Brock Peters as a black man is accused of convincing with his sweaty forehead and a combination of humble and firm behavior. Ewelovi are outside a little too neglected (in the book all the time we read about the mud and dirt), but their wickedness quite convincingly plane per day, mainly in the form of Mayelle, 2 kids 1 sandbox but still retains the image of the victim. Atticusove sisters in the book ensures a stronger education of his two children, the film is not at all a result of this I was more relieved than to bother me. These tiny little 2 kids 1 sandbox things that I have noticed and are due to differences between the book and the film suggests that the film is a very good adaptation 2 kids 1 sandbox of the book. If I was not, I would be upset other things. Thus, before the film viewer, who recently read a book, get more noticeable differences in detail between the film and the book, but the main message and the quality of work is not important. All the key scenes and questions - moral and racial by the story and brings the essence of the novel, are also present in the film and exactly the same compelling. Film his famous book of shame does not work. He is a faithful image of the novel. A great movie that is more than worth a visit. It is also true that the book I did not bring some extra sharp satisfaction or happiness (if we ignore Gregory Peck). Maybe I would be more impressed if they had watched with a certain time lag - a year or two after reading this book. It would be unburdened with the perfect book easily spotted even some gems that you can only create art film.
2013 (29) September (2) August (5) film To Kill a Mockingbird Arnold Stadler: Death and I, we Ruth Ozeki: A Tale for the Time Being Zadie Smith: White Teeth Harper Lee: Do not kill nightingale July ( 3) June (4) May (